Where is the reference by value happening?
that is true. i modified the main register.php page (not the template – as i have a special flow for registration outside the standard bbpress way) and checked against the profile_info_keys and registered the error. But I guess one could override bb_new_user and throw a new error for a duplicate too
But, i’m not sure how one would go about handling the updating of a profile, on the main profile-edit.php page, i see this hook but its after the error codes have been checked. So I guess one could hack this page for the time being for a duplicate email and handle appropriately
if ( !$errors->get_error_codes() ) {
do_action('before_profile_edited', $user->ID);
@Sambauers
4 days ago you said in 24h the .pot for 1.0 would be available. It’s no t here: http://svn.automattic.com/bbpress-i18n/pot/tags/1.0
Where is it?
$page will be greater than 1 if you are on a paginated set of pages for any kind of view, topic, etc.
so do a
global $page;
and then if ($page>1) { blah }
but search engines like google are already aware of bbPress and index it well
I integrated bbpress 1.0 with wpmu 2.7.1 and all is well, except that existing users haven’t been assigned the memebr role as I set up in the role mapping options.
New users registering on wpmu are automatically getting the memebr role, that is ok so far.
What would I need to mass convert all existing users into memebrs? using phpmyadmin or similar tools, not sure where this option is set…
Ya puedes descargarte la traducción de bbPress 1.0 Final al castellano español desde http://www.buddypress-es.com
Download bbPress 1.0 Spanish castellian from http://www.buddypress-es.com
Hey Ryan – It should be possible to integrate version 0.9 with just about any version of WordPress (including 2.7)… except for 2.8? That’s only broken because WordPress decided to change how they handled cookies and broke bbPress integration in the process…
This install of bbPress is integrated with a rails app and therefore they share cookies. No my doing, was the rails dev that integrated the two apps.
My point exactly about access. On a single server setup you might as well give more resources to mysql, it’s much more practical. The idea is to try to eliminate the bottleneck to mysql when you have contention among many clients. You won’t likely get that in a single server setup if mysql is done right.
The memcache layer in wp/bbpress is only one step above the mysql layer and the only thing you are saving is a few cpu cycles from when it decodes the serialized data from mysql to memory. It certainly doesn’t help at all the fact that bbPress 1.0, like WP, now does a gazillion copies of an object in memory as it references data, instead of using pointers like 0.9 does – all those copies add up, you can actually time the 50% decrease in performance on each ROW when displaying the front page with 25 topics and it gets magnified with each plugin used.
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/
Cache Type Cache Gets/sec
Array Cache 365000
APC Cache 98000
File Cache 27000
Memcached Cache (TCP/IP) 12200 <<<<====---
MySQL Query Cache (TCP/IP) 9900
MySQL Query Cache (Unix Socket) 13500 <<<<===---
Selecting from table (TCP/IP) 5100
Selecting from table (Unix Socket) 7400
Maybe someone should write an interface into the wp/bbpress memcache object manager to use APC/eaccelerator shared memory instead on single server systems. Apparently that would be significantly faster.
Hi!
I have a simple question to bbpress 1.0 (final) and wp 2.8: Is the bbpress integration plugin still needed for complete integration? I followed the screencast on wordpress.tv. After installing bbpress there´s no problem to login into bbpress and wp at the same time. I remeber my first tests with 1.0 alpha where it doesn´t work…
If MySQL is a bottleneck, then memcached can help on small sites (some pages reduce to zero queries). In those cases though people generally don’t have access to memcached.
perms are all ok, after installation did a chown -R group:user forum/ chmod -R 755 forum/ so that isn’t the problem
The Reputation plugin should work with 0.9:
https://bbpress.org/plugins/topic/bb-reputation/
How is it broken for you?
I’ve heard of there being solutions for pictures (or videos, etc) being uploaded to WP from a mobile device. Is that an option on bbPress?
sorry I am not using 1.0 it was a typo I am using version 0.9 with wordpress 2.7
I won’t pretend to know what kind of user base bbpress caters to or even what actual type of users are out there are using it but memcache is still an option, and one only the end user can determine him/herself; No matter how trivial single digit returns may be to the end user.
I agree. I’d like to see a recommended primer someday.
Referencing the chmod recommendation I gave, I just wanted to make sure the user’s php was actually being read. That was the ‘just to see’ part.
A common problem I deal with is many people have it setup just as you say , where some user X has rw but the Php processor is running off a lesser priv base. Or sometimes the files perms are just completly a mess, like my spelling on the iPhone.
The people who have them working under 1.0 are likely using an older theme, either from a previous version of bbPress or a 3rd party template.
Two observation:
1. I’ve got “last everything” installed.
2. It actually works.
I haven’t checked up your patches yet.
Yah, _ck_’s reputation plugin isn’t compatible with version 1.0. Your best best is to either use version 0.9, or not use the reputation plugin at all.
There are a number of avatar plugins – I’m pretty sure at least some of them work in version 1.0. Which plugin were you trying to configure?
What do you mean about not being able to delete posts… if you’re an administrator or keymaster, you should be able to delete any posts? Do you still have problems if you disable all plugins?
That’s strange. I didn’t deviate from the instructions, but they still aren’t showing. Darn, those are two very important plugins that I wanted to work. I guess I’ll just have to be patient until December.
both worked fine for me on 1.0 out of the box, no edits.
