Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Search Results for 'bbpress'

Viewing 25 results - 50,476 through 50,500 (of 64,428 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #75637
    johnhiler
    Member

    I dunno if this is related… but check out the “doubling” of Topics Started on the profile pages:

    https://bbpress.org/forums/profile/sambauers

    I think bbpress.org is using v 1.0? Not sure if it’s an issue with the core or a plugin…

    #75686
    Sam Bauers
    Participant

    The logo and screenshot are old too.

    #75674

    In reply to: SMPT server

    chrishajer
    Participant

    What version are you using? The mail function is pluggable, and there is a plugin for 1.0-alpha I think:

    https://bbpress.org/plugins/topic/smtp-mailer-for-bbpress/#post-1744

    #75366

    In reply to: bbPress 1.0 released

    chrishajer
    Participant

    I have nothing but good things to say about the 1.0 release. So far everything is working great. It’s a standalone installation. Thanks a lot Sam for all your hard work, it really shows. This is a very polished 1.0 release. Guess I should start eating crow now: http://twitter.com/chrishajer/status/2456994459

    (FWIW, I needed a forum, quick, for a project I was doing and the only forum I know is bbPress. It didn’t let me down.)

    #75685
    _ck_
    Participant

    Nice to see the page restored (see my rant here about that for those who don’t know the history)

    I can see they are already whining about “third-party publications”

    I can give you newspaper references where bbPress was mentioned if that helps:

    http://bbshowcase.org/forums/topic/big-changes-coming-to-bbpress

    I’ve got a couple others somewhere.

    Also there is a post somewhere where Matt describes how he first put bbPress together over a Christmas holiday, which is important as it’s bbPress’s genesis story.

    Oh and TalkPress should probably be mentioned on there and compare it to WordPress.com

    _ck_
    Participant

    I appreciate it when people listen to my advice. I wish more people did, I am getting a few people a day now asking how to fix so-and-so because they upgraded to 1.0 and it’s getting tiresome.

    In some cases they never saw my warning which is unfortunate but the ones who saw my warnings and figured they knew better or I would somehow drop everything and fix it anyway, well I don’t know what to say.

    #75679

    ok, nevermind – figured things out. I found a bb_break_password function but since that is hooked into the blocked role. I just made a new one with a different $secret and cleared the auth cookie after changing the email (also sent out an email to the old address notifying of the change and initiated bb_reset_email on the new email)

    it would be great if a feature like this was incorporated into bbPress for the future. :)

    #75463
    permex
    Member

    I run a bbPress site that would be some way up that top 100, and the WP site gets 15 million hits a month.

    Reading this does make me more than a little concerned – WP integration is a key feature of bbPress, as can be seen from all the talk about it on these forums. 0.9 integration is almost impossible to get working (I was never able), and the bridge between the two will likely be developed solely with 1.0 in mind from here on (not that it ever worked properly in 0.9).

    1.0 seems to the killer app for a WP/BB CMS integration, so for that reason alone it is an appealing upgrade – in my case essential, as I would not have otherwise been able to select bbPress at all. Providing a cohesive user experience is rather more important than worrying about a few CPU cycles in a case like this, as hardware is cheaper than lost page views and users.

    However, reading _ck_’s comments here and elsewhere, it is obvious he loathes 1.0 or at least has almost no interest in it.

    Since most of the rich functionality which is essential to a rounded forum is provided by _ck_’s superb plugins, it seems that for anyone dependent on them is going to be left waiting for a potentially long time, especially when _ck_ appears to have no interest in taking work, making it a matter of waiting for plugins to catch up – I am sure many users just couldn’t upgrade without being able to carry forward their existing features, which rather renders the whole issue of supporting 0.9 moot.

    I’d have to say, it would be a situation like this, and not any “heaviness”, which would press me into looking at an alternative solution…

    michael3185
    Member

    For what it’s worth, I’m taking your advice _ck_, and sticking with 0.9 for the foreseeable future. I don’t want to loose all the functionality the current plugins give.

    I have to agree about the version names too. Renumbering 0.9 to 1.0, then making the new version 2.0 may have given people a bit more pause for thought before gleefully installing the new version. The numbering gives the appearance of being a minor upgrade, when obviously it isn’t. Not that it’s an issue for experienced users, but the sudden flood of “Why doesn’t this plugin work now?” questions wasn’t hard to see coming, was it?

    _ck_
    Participant

    Post Meta is so complex I might not be supporting it anymore under the new 1.0

    It uses a great deal of hacky workarounds to function and was kind of experimental in the first place.

    Since 1.0 now really does have post meta ability (at least in the database) you might want to try making something work with that.

    As a side note I find all these “has anyone figured how to make so-and-so work under 1.0” questions very strange. People should not be using 1.0 so soon unless they know how to figure it out themselves. Also 1.0 has also only been out a few days, not even a week, how many people does everyone think are rushing to upgrade to 1.0 so soon?

    The way some plugins will be broken under 1.0 is non-trivial. There are database changes, hook changes, the way data is moved around has changed, cache system has changed, variables are renamed. It’s a different creature than 0.9, not a simple upgrade. The numbering system is very misleading – 0.9 is really 1.0 and 1.0 is really like 2.0

    #15214
    Silvanovicz
    Member

    Not sure if it’s just me, but does Avatar upload stopped working in version 1.0.1?

    The avatar upload page doesn’t seem to work anymore. Whenever I click on the ‘Avatar’ link (when logged in), it used to load the page, but now it just takes me back to the forum homepage. Has anyone else experienced this?

    http://www.wearepopslags.com/forum/

    #75629
    Marcomail
    Member

    the plugin on wordpress it’s necessary! i can log in wp admin if i log in bbpress, if you log in wordpress the cookie are not set to enter in bbpress admin.

    vanesta
    Member

    Both installation on WP (2.8)

    WP1 is on domain.com, and WP2 is on sub.domain.com (same domain name)

    Both allow single sign on between WP1 and WP2 with this on wp-config.php

    define(‘COOKIE_DOMAIN’, ‘.domain.com’);

    define(‘COOKIEPATH’, ‘/’);

    define(‘AUTH_SALT’, ‘6428746726478264’);

    define(‘LOGGED_IN_SALT’, ‘74829749827489237424’);

    define(‘AUTH_COOKIE’, ‘7482647263478623478’);

    define(‘SECURE_AUTH_COOKIE’, ‘985847584758475’);

    define(‘LOGGED_IN_COOKIE’, ‘98752975897435894375894’);

    define(‘TEST_COOKIE’, ‘8947519875894758495’);

    So I basically override the cookie also.

    Now I installed BBPress (1.0)

    These WP-CONFIG setting won’t work even I added BB_LOGGED_IN_COOKIE variable

    It only works with BBPress if i use these only

    define(‘COOKIE_DOMAIN’, ‘.domain.com’);

    define(‘COOKIEPATH’, ‘/’);

    define(‘AUTH_KEY’, ‘xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’);

    define(‘SECURE_AUTH_KEY’, ‘xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’);

    define(‘LOGGED_IN_KEY’, ‘xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’);

    define(‘NONCE_KEY’, ‘xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’);

    define(‘AUTH_SALT’, ‘xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’);

    define(‘LOGGED_IN_SALT’, ‘xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’);

    But if I add anything with _COOKIE bbpress + wp signed on won’t work, if I take it out, it will with with BBPress but multiple WP single sing on won’t work

    Thanks guys

    Victoria

    Post your versions up. Fill out below:

    WP? WPMU?

    blog is subdomain? folder?

    bbpress .9? 1.0?

    Integration plugin ver?

    #75628
    infected
    Participant

    @Jason_JM: Okay, but as i said it works also without having the plugin installed. I tried it on my testblog, before going live. And if the plugin is really needed for integration it should be mentioned in the documentation. It´s the first place to go for users who are trying to integrate bbpress with wordpress…

    But one more point: What about those 2 folders called my-plugins & my-templates. Is there a reason for why i can´t access them with my ftp? The folders can´t not opened either i can´t change their chmods. I´m using Filezilla as ftp tool. It reports “Failed to retrieve directory listing” when i try to open on of this folders.

    #75684
    #74985
    laimonas
    Member

    It was doing a similar thing or me, would not advance to step 1. After some debugging, it turned out that I didn’t have php-mysql installed. bbpress code detects it but the error message was getting lost and simply the response was redirected back to step 0.

    Doing apt-get install php5-mysql did the trick.

    #75683

    I slapped something up there to, at the least, get it pointed that 1.0 is out.

    #75627

    The plugin is required because it will call functions to clear your bbpress login cookies. It will also be called to create your bbpress cookies (cookies with paths that = /bb-admin, /bb-plugins, /my-plugins). Without this these will not get created.

    These cookies allow you to enter into the admin/dashboard of the user in the respective app.

    Which is pretty much the entire point of integration plugin.

    #15211
    johnhiler
    Member

    Anyone up for updating the bbPress wikipedia page with the latest on the 1.0 release?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BbPress

    I’d do it, but wasn’t sure which 1.0 features we should highlight… so thought I’d defer to a fellow member of the bbPress community.

    #75626
    infected
    Participant

    Hm… I´m a bit confused, too. All seems to work fine. But why the plugin description says “This plugin is only useful if you are running bbPress version 1.0-alpha-4 or later” and why the plugin was updated to 1.0 if it works fine without it?

    #15212
    taboo
    Member

    Hi,

    I started investigating possibilities of translation bbPress to Polish. This language along with quite a few non-germanic languages has quite complex plural forms (3 forms instead of just 2). Not getting into much detail, because of the way functions.bb-core.php hardcodes seconds, hours, days… names it’s hard to do a proper translation.

    To do it right I’d need a function that uses “%d month” and not just “month” or “months” as defined here:

    // array of time period chunks

    $chunks = array(

    array(60 * 60 * 24 * 365 , __(‘year’) , __(‘years’)),

    array(60 * 60 * 24 * 30 , __(‘month’) , __(‘months’)),

    array(60 * 60 * 24 * 7, __(‘week’) , __(‘weeks’)),

    array(60 * 60 * 24 , __(‘day’) , __(‘days’)),

    array(60 * 60 , __(‘hour’) , __(‘hours’)),

    array(60 , __(‘minute’) , __(‘minutes’)),

    array(1 , __(‘second’) , __(‘seconds’)),

    );

    Any help would be very much appreciated.

    #75625

    @ cornetjr

    I do have all the keys set, including the nonce key.

    In the bb-config file you will find this url

    https://api.wordpress.org/secret-key/1.1/bbpress/

    where it will define all the secret keys for you automatically

    I simply copied and pasted.

    Or you can use the ones defined on the wordpress end, as per the link on the wp-config file

    https://api.wordpress.org/secret-key/1.1/

    Whichever ones you end up using, make sure the strings match in both config files. See if this makes it work for you.

    Edit: Never mind, I noticed you fixed it, while I was posting. Maybe this info can be useful in other cases.

    You don’t have to define them all, in the settings.php if it’s not defined they get created for you in some respects for some of them. This will help you during integration.

    In fact anytime you use these defines you are saying to bbpress that the value your defining will manually override anything in the DB.

    A goal to have during integration is to try and let the apps do the most work. This way human error can be eliminated. Now there are always exceptions but on a ‘basic’ setup. So again, avoid defines unless otherwise specifically told to (say by the integration plugin or bbpress integration settings).

    #75624
    cornetjr
    Member

    NEVERMIND!!!

    Apparently the problem was that when you try to login as ‘admin’ user the bbpress and wordpress user list gets confused. It thinks that they are two different users since there is the admin in bbpress user database upon install and an existing one in wordpress. This creates a conflict. I created a new admin account under a different username in wordpress and everything works correctly.

    BBpress integration plugin IS NOT REQUIRED to get integration to work correctly.

    I am not sure why, but “auth” cookie salt & WordPress “logged in” cookie salt in bbpress does not have to match that in wordpress.

    Lastly, the most important variable other than in bb-config and wp-config files:

    define(‘AUTH_KEY’,’ ‘);

    define(‘SECURE_AUTH_KEY’,’ ‘);

    define(‘LOGGED_IN_KEY’, ‘ ‘);

    Is to verify that User database table prefix is set correctly. To verify this, set field usually to wp_ and check the user list. If you have this value set correctly, then bbpress imports all users into bbpress admin area. Integration is super easy, but there are a few admin/instructional issues that have not been updated and can cause confusion. Please post if you have further questions!!!

Viewing 25 results - 50,476 through 50,500 (of 64,428 total)
Skip to toolbar