Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Search Results for 'code'

Viewing 25 results - 20,451 through 20,475 (of 32,499 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #91690

    In reply to: Delete own posts

    _ck_
    Participant

    Yes you can, easily.

    I have a mini-plugin for this somewhere around here…

    Here you go:

    <?php
    /*
    Plugin Name: Delete Own Post
    */
    function delete_own_post($retvalue,$capability,$args) {return ($capability=='delete_post') ? bb_current_user_can('edit_post',$args[1]) : $retvalue;}
    add_filter('bb_current_user_can','delete_own_post',10,3);
    ?>

    Note that they can only delete for as long as they can edit.

    Meaning after the 1 hour default, no more delete.

    But you can change the timeout in the admin settings.

    #34823

    What’s all missing in terms of features in 0.9 when we compare it to bbPress 1.0+ ?

    • XMLRPC – but do we use it right now? I haven’t heard of anything using bbPress XMLRPC
    • WordPress matching backend

    What else? I never used 0.9 much. BTW, I think most of the functionality a forum owner would need are covered by _ck_’s plugins ;)

    I would like to hear from you guys.

    mdolon
    Member

    Thanks zaerl!

    In terms of integration, I connected the databases between WP and bbPress during installation and made sure that the cookie information matched in both configuration files (bb-config and wp-config). Those two steps made it so when a user registered and logged in at my forum, they were logged in at my blog too.

    I didn’t really need any of the WordPress functions in bbPress so I skipped the deep integration part (calling wp-load). The only bit of dynamic code in my header is checking to see if a user is logged in, and on WordPress you can do that with:


    <?php if(is_user_logged_in()){?>
    Do something
    <?php } ?>

    I use caching to load the sidebar and footer. When someone visits my main site, http://devgrow.com/, it creates a cache of the sidebar and footer if there is no existing cache or if it’s older than 6 hours. The cache is just a text file that contains the output of the dynamic bits in my sidebar in HTML format, which I just include in my bbPress sidebar and footer.

    I also wrote some custom code to pull the recent and popular (most replies) topics and display them with their topic icons.

    Hope that makes sense, let me know if you have any other questions.

    #82560
    pagal
    Participant

    paste it before </head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><br />
    <title>Unique Title Here</title><br />
    <meta name="description" content="Description of your page" /><br />
    <meta name="keywords" content="keyword1, keyword2, keyword 3" /><br />
    <meta name="robots" content="index,follow" /><br />
    <meta name="distribution" content="uk, united kingdom, london, global"><br />
    <meta name="document-classification" content="another,keywords, here"><br />
    <meta name="rating" content="General"><br />
    <meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="TRUE"><br />
    <meta name="Copyright" content="website titlet"><br />
    <meta name="developer" content="http://www.developer-name.com"><br />
    <meta name="Author" content="Author Name"><br />
    <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" /><br />

    #91367

    In reply to: Registration Email

    _ck_
    Participant

    Note that filter is only available in bbPress 1.0 and 1.1, if you are trying to do it in 0.9 it will not work.

    In 0.9 unfortunately you’d have to edit the end of registration-functions.php

    #88426
    _ck_
    Participant

    Here is what (the highly respected) Mark Jaquith has to say about the very similar problem over on the WordPress side:

    Why WordPress Themes are Derivative of WordPress

    And I guess the way I stated this whole thing was wrong to begin with, what I meant instead was that if you sell premium themes to remember they also have to be GPL – IF you start with another theme that is GPL.

    You can’t make a premium theme that uses GPL code from another theme or bbPress/WordPress itself and sell it without making it GPL.

    (now I think I finally said it correctly)

    I guess the sad conclusion to all this is how bbPress standalone now has some really nice premium themes but is ending standalone development.

    mdolon
    Member

    Check it out: http://devgrow.com/discuss

    It took about a week to get everything the way I wanted. At first I wanted to do a deep integration but it was too much of a pain, so I just ended up writing some custom code to cache most of my sidebar, header and footer elements from my blog and display the cached content in bbPress.

    Plugins I’m using:

    • Allow Images
    • Auto Add to Favorites
    • BBcode Lite
    • Google Sitemap Generator
    • Post Count Plus
    • Post Count Plus for WordPress
    • Subscribe to Topic
    • Topic Icons
    • Custom Plugin for Recent/Popular Topics

    And some more custom code throughout the templates. Would love to answer questions or hear feedback!

    #34841

    Topic: something useful

    in forum Installation
    AaronIsaac
    Member

    Okay, first thing’s first… if this is the forum on the bbPress site itself, it really needs to be a bit more of a better example. As it is, when I get to the forum I’m first faced with a giant tagcloud, then I have to scroll all the way down past a huge list of posts to get to the actual individual forums such as this one. Of course, I could hit the button to start a new topic at the top of the top of the page but not only is that counterintuitive, it’s a really bad idea in general that will get people just Pcoming in and posting without looking at other posts first. I’d hoped the layout would have been changed by now at least.

    Second problem, and this is one I’ve had on the wordpress forums as well but never bothered to ask about it. At the bottom of the post box it lists allowed tags (shortly after mentioning “Enter a few words (called tags)” with a link to the tagcloud rather than a definition of tags), but what gets me is “Put code in between backticks.” I’ve been running forums since before ISPs could offer residential Internet connections and yet I have absolutely no clue what that means. Unless this software is only meant for WordPress users (which I’m one of, btw), it would be best to get a bit more accessible to ordinary people in terms of language/jargon.

    My other large beef is that the forums read like blog comments rather than forum discussions. Threading would be my number one request if I intended to use it. I guess my number two request would be integrating said threaded comments into the comments section of blog entries for those using it with a WP blog, though that’s a lot more complicated. I’d want to start off with the other way around by having the blog able to automatically display posts from certain sections such as Announcements and such. I’m not sure if that functionality exists yet, so apologies if it does. If not, I suppose a workaround could be reading the rss feed from that section into the blog section, but aggregating your own feeds is a fairly silly notion.

    That’s it for initial feedback right now. I may come take another look when the software has matured a bit… by that I mean the core, it shouldn’t have to depend on plugins and themes to have very basic funcionality on its own.

    #91589
    _ck_
    Participant

    It’s hand coded, probably into the template system.

    It’s parsing the readme.txt file.

    Far too custom that you’d ever find a plugin for it.

    It’s probably using in part some of the code from Mark Jaquith who designed the readme.txt format for Matt/Automattic and implemented by mdawaffe (Michael)

    http://wordpress-plugin-readme-parser.googlecode.com/

    hpguru
    Member

    I think bbPress standalone is dead in 2010.

    Matt Mullenweg: Non-plugin bbPress development is going to continue until we have a perfect importer so people will be able to bring their content out of the legacy codebase.

    bbPress 1.1 may be here.

    Greg
    Participant

    I guess one could also use the check on BBP_VERSION (or equivalent) to print an error message when the plugin refuses to activate.

    But a user would still need to install the plugin or look in the code (or read the README if the plugin author was good enough to mention the dependency).

    @_ck_

    Thanks a lot :)

    I am gonna ditch v1.0+ and start using 0.9 from now on. Will downgrade my other installations too.

    #91364

    In reply to: Registration Email

    _ck_
    Participant

    Oh sorry, I lost track, too many things going on everywhere.

    Save it into a plugin (ie. custom-registraton-email.php) put it into your my-plugins/ directory and activate.

    Gautam Gupta
    Participant

    One can easily do a check on activation if BBP_VERSION is defined and optionally a version_compare check too, and if it doesn’t satisfy the condition, then the plugin should deactivate itself.

    Greg
    Participant

    Hmmm. Seems that even the mod is hijacking threads on bbpress.org these days… :)

    Feel free to start a different thread to talk about the specific performance aspects of bbPlugin versus bbStandalone.

    One more attempt to focus this thread on the original question: I am interested in a discussion on the relative merits of evolving bbStandalone and bbPlugin independently versus in a coordinated fashion, NOT the relative merits of bbStandalone versus bbPlugin.

    Repeating the advantages of both, with one additional pro that I thought of for the coupled roadmap.

    Advantages of a coupled roadmap:

    – Higher quality for standalone (benefitting from the larger installed base of the plugin)

    – Better performance for the plugin (benefitting from the big standalone sites)

    – More tight WP integration is likely for standalone

    – Easier “cross-grades” between plugin and standalone version

    Advantages of independent evolution of the plugin and standalone versions

    – More flexibility in release roadmap for both versions

    – No compromises for either version

    #91527
    deadlyhifi
    Participant

    The plugin is Add bbPress Default Role. It’s three lines of code so you may be better just writing it into your functions.php file.

    _ck_
    Participant

    <cite>ashfame</cite>

    I guess all your plugins are tagged https://bbpress.org/plugins/tags/_ck_

    right?

    And I believe even your updated plugins support 0.9 ?

    Unfortunately the plugin section is still broken and does not import tags so the _ck_ tag is no longer complete there (update: someone appears to have fixed it in the past 24 hours)

    For now this is the only way to find them all:

    http://bbshowcase.org/forums/topic/_ck_-plugin-catalog-index

    Virtually 100% my plugins will support 0.9 (except ones specifically made to “fix” 1.x)

    <cite>Mark McWilliams</cite>

    Not with WordPres 3.0 anyway, 1 install, multiple sites! :)

    Well, multiple BLOGS, I am not sure if they can get multiple forums going on the first version, we’ll see. But I am sure it’s a goal of Matt’s so they can use it on WordPress.com

    _ck_: As far as I could guess, you’d have to install multiple copies of WP.

    Not with WordPres 3.0 anyway, 1 install, multiple sites! :)

    #91462

    In reply to: Front-end editing

    Erlend
    Participant

    @Ryan: I had JS enabled but.., aha, I never noticed the double-click edit upon mouse hover before. Neat :)

    Now, the thing I encountered in both the P2 theme and Justin’s forum plugin is: Neither (seems to be able to-) take advantage of WordPress’ own in-built rich text editor.

    I probably did not make this clear enough in my first post. My main point sort of ended up in the second to last paragraph:

    What I’d love to see is rich front-end editing based on the native WP editor

    What I’m inquiring about is:

    How to achieve front-end editing with WordPress’ native rich editor?

    The main question is of course ‘how will bbPress go about doing this?’, but clearly this method is still unbeknown to many plugin authors who could greatly benefit from it.

    (Disclaimer: My project relies on the bp-wiki plugin, and I am indeed curious as to the possibility of a a more conventional approach to rich front end edits in the future.)

    One ‘almost’ example I found is this one:

    https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tinymce-excerpt/

    It grabs the native editor and displays it somewhere new. However I suspect it can only do so because it’s still within the confines of the admin backend. Posting and editing content from front-end can clearly be achieved, but apparently with severe limitations. It’s getting functions that are normally limited to the backend (tinymce editor, file upload, etc) to the front-end that is awkward.

    Speaking of which, feasibility image/file uploads would make for an excellent follow-up question, but maybe you’d rather have me start a new thread for it?

    Erlend
    Participant

    Alright, appreciate the response. I think we’ve exhausted this discussion then ;)

    Matt Mullenweg
    Keymaster

    Non-plugin bbPress development is going to continue until we have a perfect importer so people will be able to bring their content out of the legacy codebase.

    #91264
    Matt Mullenweg
    Keymaster

    Greg, I think we agree, just have different ideas about where that line is drawn. I’ve laid out the core philosophy as a framework for discussions above. I have never advocated making every plugin a core feature, and conversely I doubt you’re suggesting making every line of code in bbPress a plugin.

    Balancing between the two is how development happens, and is best navigated in the context of a specific anchor (feature) rather than in abstract.

    Greg
    Participant

    I can see strong arguments for both a wp plugin and a standalone forum.

    Also, the reality is that both will exist in the future. The WP team is very passionate about “bbPress as plugin” and at the same time some existing large installations will see to the continuation of standalone version in some format.

    So it might be good to frame this decision differently than plugin versus standalone… The real question is: to what extent do we want the plugin and standalone versions of the bbPress code base to evolve independently versus in a coordinated way?

    Simplistically, the two options are:

    1. coupled roadmap with coordinated releases or periodic rev/fwd integrations

    2. independent roadmaps that diverge over time (the current plan of record)

    Both options (coupled roadmap and independent roadmap) can work, but it would be better for this decision to be the result of thoughtful discussion.

    To kick things off, here are some pros of a coupled roadmap:

    – Higher quality for standalone (benefitting from the larger installed base of the plugin)

    – Better performance for the plugin (benefitting from the big standalone sites)

    – More tight WP integration is likely

    And some pros of independent evolution of the plugin and standalone versions

    – More flexibility in release roadmap for both versions

    – No compromises for either version

    Another more subtle effect to consider is the impact on dev resources invested in the code base. For example, I think that there are currently a lot of “silent” but significant resources being invested in standalone bbPress development. It would be great to pull more of that work into the official project, but I fear that opportunity will go away once the move is made to “bbPress as plugin”.

Viewing 25 results - 20,451 through 20,475 (of 32,499 total)
Skip to toolbar