Search Results for 'bbpress'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
December 11, 2008 at 2:07 am #69649
In reply to: bbPress Facebook page
kevinjohngallagher
MemberHi Ipstenu,
I’m going to disagree with you a little mate, and try not to take it off topic too much.
Yes, each adjective is subjective to ones perspective. “easy” and “alot” etc. can mean different things to different people. That said, lets look at them a sec.
“extensive plugins?”
There are just under 120 plugins for BBPress.
Over 1/3rd haven’t been updated in a year. I’d wager a good few of them don’t work anymore.
And the ones with latest comments 6-12 months ago, usually don’t work either.
Also from what i’ve seen about 1/4 of them are redundant or useless in 0.9 / 1.0alpha.
So we’re looking at maybe 40-50 plugins.
Does anyone think that’s “extensive”?
I know it’s subjective, but, um, well you can make up your own mind.
“You CAN redesign the hell out of a bbPress site”
To a certain extent i’ll agree and disagree with it. To redesign a bbpress forum so that it doesn’t look like this theme actually takes a bucket load of work. I’ve done it for 3 websites, and every time it’s involved me writing full on plugins just to output the right code, or W3C acceptable code, or overwrite the damned code thats stored outwith the templates (why is that btw?).
Can i stop and ask that? WHY does a theme designer NEED to write alot of non basic php code as a separate to their theme plugin, just to over write HARDCODED design output? Since when was hardcoding design output into the core of a theme-able piece of software a good idea?
What you can’t do with bbpress, is hand a Designer/ HTML coder your template files and expect to get anything back that’s not a flat output of a table. It’s a point I raised a while ago (and i’ll not bang on about it) but BBpress works at doing one thing. Outputting a flat list from a database.
In terms of your all forums kinda look the same , i have to agree in this instance. Most forums, ipb/vBulletin/phpBB etc do all look the same. but guess what. bbpress doesn’t look much like them. I’ve stated before BBpress’s horrific handling of parent/children with categories etc. is bloody woeful; but if you’re talking about usability, then bbpress starts to fall down a little.
What it outputs is simple, yes, to the user, but it’s not very perceptive. Finding a specific post or vital information (say that 0.9 = WP2.5 – you know , something you’d expect to be on the documentation or download page but is actually on page 3 of a topic started 1 year ago) , is a disaster. It’s reliant on the user
who posted the content using TAGS appropriotely and ofc it requires a better search function.
Lets not forget that ‘tags’ are fairly new, and really only web savvy people use/know about them. A huge chunk of this software’s cross-pollination and iteration is taken out of the developers hands and placed smack bang in teh hand of the end user (whom we know nothing about nor can reply on).
Just because something is simple/plain, does not make it inherently usable.
Think Boo.com.
================================================
Anyway, there are a number of things we’d all like to see fixed in bbpress. Some more vital than others. we’ll all agree and disagree on many, but my over riding feeling is this:
Our Clients, customers, friends, colleagues, schools, own sites, will at some stage like to, nah need to, be updated to the latest version of WordPress. it will vary from person to person, but at some stage you know that a wordpress upgrade is probably in the pipes.
But if you’re using BBpress, then you’ve been forced to hold off upgrading for over half a year. We will be/are a whole version behind, and surely someone can see that it’s got to be an issue.
I suppose what i dont understand is, and maybe i’m the only one, so please 100% feel free to explain it to me like an idiot.
if The most requested topic on this website is “wordpress integration”, and the singular fail point of the software is “wordpress integration”, and teh company that owns this software also own wordpress, and it happens to be your singular initial selling point of the software, um, well, WHY THE HELL HAS IT NOT BEEN THE ONLY PRIORITY AND FIXED IN THE 3 MONTHS SINCE 1.0ALPHA CAME OUT?
We’ve had other fixes, new code, new features, a facebook page (see i hadn’t forgotten), but yet without even a hint of when this base level feature might appear, we’re told it’s a moving target.
Please, explain it to me like a 5 year old, that hasn’t read the blog posts linking to the $29 million dollars investment, that also lead to Sam being taken on as a full time developer on bbpress (i.e. dont say no time/resources).
December 11, 2008 at 2:04 am #4396Topic: Which version of bbPress does bbpress.org use?
in forum InstallationJohn James Jacoby
KeymasterCurious if it’s a working trunk version or alpha or what?
December 11, 2008 at 2:01 am #69068In reply to: Integrate wp2.7 and bbp1.0a2
levifig
MemberSure, but when is a 1.0 product coming out?? And remember, WP is not bound to bbPress and bbPress is just darn slow! I’m ok with that, but I can’t afford using it if that’s the case! Every new WP version breaks integration and then there’s months before a new version of bbPress comes out… Sorry, not for me!
Don’t get me wrong, I love what they got here, but it just doesn’t fit me! I’ll recommend it to ppl wanting a very lightweight forum with little to no integration with any CMS! Well.. in that case why use bbPress, that’s my question!
See?
December 11, 2008 at 1:16 am #69648In reply to: bbPress Facebook page
Ipstenu (Mika Epstein)
ModeratorI think it’s best we say its… Not fit for purpose.
Well that entirely depends on your purpose.
I agree with many of your points but you can make them of many other (if not all) bb sites. The majority of sites look similar because of usability. People are used to things working a certain way, and they expect familiarity (which is how many many people out there define ‘usability’). That’s why car design doesn’t change much. It’s not perfect, but people like it. That’s why people cried bloody murder over OS changes from Windows 3.1 to XP, but they got over it. Change is hard for users to accept. They don’t want to learn how to drive, again, they want to get on the road and talk about STEAM, damn it!
Yes ‘easy’ integration with your WordPress site is a misrepresentation at this time. But the rest? That’s all perception and usage. You CAN redesign the hell out of a bbPress site. If you want to. The base code IS customizable, there ARE a lot of plugins. These are facts. What you do with the options is up to you, though.
I don’t think bbPress is perfect, but after spending years trying to mesh my site with other forums out there, I’d rather have this than them.
(Steam is a joke from http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting which is my favorite thing ever)
December 11, 2008 at 1:04 am #69647In reply to: bbPress Facebook page
John James Jacoby
KeymasterCould not have said it any better… If Matt was paying my bills, I would be the first to step up and commit myself to making bbPress exactly what the audience of WordPress wants it to be and still make Matt happy…
Matt, are you listening?
December 10, 2008 at 10:30 pm #4357elegos
MemberHello there!
I was wondering… which addons will be put as “predefinite” in bbPress? I know that “less is more”, but atm, using the 1.0 alpha, I can’t say it’s a newbie-friendly type of forum:
– there is no bbCode (who knows it will use it, not HTML ) => you have to add a plugin (bbCode) and another one to enable the images tag.
– no smiles (ok, the abuse of them is something like HELL, but the absence is too), you have to add a plugin, and another one to enable images (if you haven’t done before).
– the editor too is too poor: can’t you make an addon to easily insert all the tags you can insert in? (like the bbCode one, not compatible with Opera)
– avatars: c’mon, you’ve got them also in the official bbPress forum
– another addon
So… there will be some addons like these in the release version? If not, how do you expect people will take bbPress if they allways have to stay under all the most important plugins? What if a developer stops working on one of them?
Thanks
December 10, 2008 at 8:52 pm #69646In reply to: bbPress Facebook page
kevinjohngallagher
Member” Integration only became a real “feature” of bbPress with 0.9 when it was brought front and centre during install and got it’s own admin options page.”
Yeah, but that was 8 months ago. It’s not like it’s a massive shock we’ve all just got over. 0.9 was stable 8 months ago.
“Unfortunately WordPress is a moving target and it is difficult to keep up with all it’s changes”
But in terms of a moving target mate, 1) its well documented 2) you work for the company 3) we dont need to keep up with ALL the changes, and 4) it’s been 8 months!
I know that may look like i’m labouring a point, but its more to clarify. If 0.9 nor 1.0alpha cannot integrate with wordpress 2.6 (which has had 3 betas and 4 point releases) in the last 7 months, is it even likely that we’ll get it in the next 7 months?
I, and everyone here, realises that wordpress is changeable, we accept that totally, but if what we’re saying is that BBpress will release 1 stable version ever 3 versions of wordpress (and it will only integrate with the first version) , then really, i think it’s time for me and the others to say goodbye.
“It’s a little unfair to say that bbPress isn’t usable. “
Yes, that’s true.
I think it’s best we say its… Not fit for purpose.
Let me show you how mate, with the blow coming from your own BBpress website:
“bbPress is focused on web standards, ease of use, ease of integration, and speed”
-https://bbpress.org/
See any of my posts last month bout how web standards are not being met.
And, ease of integration, really? I’m hoping that as funny as the irony/joke of the facebook page.
“our extensive plugin system”.
-https://bbpress.org/
Half of them dont work. Most of the Authors have long since left the sinking ship. 0.9 was a milestone, and you folks all did such a stellar job; but man has the side been let down, and infact gotten alot smaller. Where would we be without _CK_?
“is highly customizable.”
This made me laugh too. Have you ever wondered why all BBpress forums look the same? No different icons, layout, DT/DDs, OL/LIs, etc. Every single one looks like the bog standard one, with the exception of the logo and border/background colours. This either means that everyone loves their website to be identical (hmmmm, no) or maybe hardcoding alot of things into a non template-able file is actually a stupid idea.
“Easy integration with your blog.
WordPress and bbPress are siblings, and they get along together “
– https://bbpress.org/about/features/
*cough*
“bbPress integration should work with most recent version of WordPress”
– https://bbpress.org/documentation/integration-with-wordpress/
Honestly, cant make this up.
And so the list goes on…
We like bbpress Sam, otherwise we wouldn’t be here. But currently, it’s not Fit for Purpose, and it doesn’t do what it claims to do. When you add into that the widening gap between WordPress and BBpress we as a community start to get a bit perturbed.
If you take away all those claims above, the claims that brought us to this site and to this software, then we’re left with a rather generic bit of forum software, that (plug-ins or no plug-ins) doesn’t have the same features or options as other software out there. If you’re a big multinational with millions of forum posts, then maybe that’s ideal, but maybe, just maybe, its not what everyone is after.
This is the crux of the issue. If you’re building something that is purely aimed at being the forum software for WordPress.com, then lets take down the bullshit on the website, and we’ll all skuttle off.
If we’re all helping Automattic in making BBpress an amazing alternative in to bloated forums, then you have to realise that living up to your bbpress’s own website’s statements of fact is simply the least we expect.
December 10, 2008 at 8:38 pm #69625In reply to: New forum layout
Ipstenu (Mika Epstein)
ModeratorThanks to Brilliant Button Maker, I made a little web badge: http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/7561/bbpressuq7.png
December 10, 2008 at 8:15 pm #69645In reply to: bbPress Facebook page
kevinjohngallagher
MemberI actually had the same reaction the JJJ had, and i feel that Chris Hajer did a really nice job in summing it up. My initial thoughts were, so Sam is posted missing for 2 months and when he reappears he’s made a facebook page??? (it’s hard to think that automattic got $29million in January to pay for sucj development but i digress).
Sam, i think that maybe you cant see the wood for the trees here mate.
I know, you know, JJJ and CK knows that Matt wanted XML-RPC controls in BBpress. Which is ofc all and well as he pays the bills. But as i’ve said before, there is NOT ONE post about it (request, bug, questions, comment) on this forum or on _CK_’s showcase forum, because it’s frankly of little or not use to any of us. That is not to say developers cant see it’s value in the long run, it’s just that when you say that WordPress is a “moving target” we kind of think… Yeah, but you’ve had 8 months to hit that target and instead you’ve developed a feature that no-one wants or uses. Heck you folks at WP dont use it (it’s THAT bloody useful).
I, and everyone else, understand the way in which this software came about. We also understand that it’s officially ‘beta’ though lets be honest you guys call 0.9 stable. But that’s not to say that maybe, just maybe, if you want this software community to thrive then listening in some part to the concerns of the community who are doing our best to help is a step in the right direction.
“Integration of user tables and cookies is a priority on the other hand, as is creating a full XML-RPC interface for those who want to pull data into a WordPress install”
So what you’re saying is that you have two priorities. One which has a forum full of people pulling their heads out and screaming over. And one that no-one is needing straight away. Why, oh WHY, is the later being worked upon first?
Surely, and i’m worried this might cause personal offence where none is intended, ANY IDIOT can see that logging in and registration is, i dunno, VITAL to a forum?!?!?
So why is it not the TOP priority?
And if it is the top priority, and its so unbelievably complex that making BBpress integrate with WP 2.6 or 2.7 in the 248 days since the cookie processing change was announced, is it likely that we’re going to have it fixed any time soon?
December 10, 2008 at 7:24 pm #69686In reply to: phpbb3 -> bbpress converter
wmnasef
Memberno worries about subforums, they will appear as with phpbb3, but bbpress doesn’t have the hidden forum option so they will be viewable to everyone after conversion.
maybe you can use that plugin to hide them again after conversion.
December 10, 2008 at 7:13 pm #69624In reply to: New forum layout
chrishajer
ParticipantI liked it with the circle, just not the small caps. It always looks better as bbPress whenever it’s written.
I checked the USPTO online and found the WordPress word mark but not one for bbPress. Maybe Automattic should register that.
December 10, 2008 at 6:30 pm #69066In reply to: Integrate wp2.7 and bbp1.0a2
tomwi
Memberyep, very frustrating… i have the same issue whether i use 2.5 and alpha 1 rc2, 2.6 and alpha1 rc2, or 2.7 and alpha 1 rc2.
login to WP, go to BB and click on “Admin” does not go to Admin section – BROKEN
login WP, user stays logged in to WP and BB – WORKS
login to BB, user is not logged into WP – BROKEN
I’ve tried every integration post on wordpress.org and bbpress.org with no luck. anyone have ideas?
December 10, 2008 at 5:14 pm #69685In reply to: phpbb3 -> bbpress converter
hhberthelsen
MemberSounds awesome, will test it one of the next days. We have nearly 200.000 posts – will be interesting to test, and surely on my own dedicated server 😮
Any concerns regarding subforums or “hidden” forums, that i should be warned about?
December 10, 2008 at 4:48 pm #69065In reply to: Integrate wp2.7 and bbp1.0a2
levifig
MemberI think we’re all on the same boat: accounts shared and… that’s about it!
F.R.U.S.T.R.A.T.I.N.G.
I’m starting to wonder if this is actually a worthy open-source project or some project that started with some pretty good intentions and just died out! bbPress is in nooo way related to WP!
December 10, 2008 at 4:43 pm #69064In reply to: Integrate wp2.7 and bbp1.0a2
Joss Winn
MemberJust to add to this conversation: I’ve tried to integrate WPMU Version 2.7-RC1-10145 and bbPress Version 1.0-alpha-2 (both from svn trunk).
User accounts are being shared, user roles are not mapping, cookies are not working.
Anyone else got past this point without a dirty hack for these recent versions?
(On another note, bbPress doesn’t seem to want to know about users that are created from LDAP accounts which WPMU is authenticating against. It only recognises locally created accounts). I’m using this nice plugin for LDAP.
December 10, 2008 at 4:21 pm #68921In reply to: WPMU integration
Joss Winn
MemberGlad someone else is having the same problem
I’ve managed to make things even more complicated now as I’ve integrated LDAP authentication with WPMU 2.7 but bbpress doesn’t seem to be able authenticate users that are created in WPMU from LDAP.
Ah, well. Enough for one day.
December 10, 2008 at 4:21 pm #69063In reply to: Integrate wp2.7 and bbp1.0a2
levifig
MemberAgain, I posted something here this morning and it’s not showing up while it showed up immediately after posting…
Will it show up later? Is it gone forever?
Bottom line: no more bbPress for me!
lyrics
MemberWhat can be the maximum load on bbPress
December 10, 2008 at 3:04 pm #69600In reply to: Removing all Bozo data from my database
lyrics
MemberProbably version 0.9.0.3 might support Bozo-related data from a bbPress database?
December 10, 2008 at 3:02 pm #69889In reply to: bbPress 0.9.0.3 (stable) released
_ck_
ParticipantThere are no added new features only bugfixes, one important. No security issues.
These are the only files that need to be replaced on a 0.9.0.2sp1 install:
Props should be given to ipstenu who was the first to report the serious profile email editing bug which was actually in the code for eight months and no-one noticed. Essentially no regular member could change their email address after registering. Admin could change anyone’s email address without a problem which is why it probably went un-noticed for so long.
December 10, 2008 at 3:01 pm #69671In reply to: bbPress Romania
lyrics
MemberInternationalizing the bbPress forum is possible?
December 10, 2008 at 2:58 pm #69888In reply to: bbPress 0.9.0.3 (stable) released
lyrics
MemberI would like to know the features of bbPress 0.9.0.3
December 10, 2008 at 11:58 am #68919In reply to: WPMU integration
Joss Winn
MemberDid you integrate bbpress 1.0 svn and wpmu 2.7 svn? That’s what I’m trying to do. I’ve got them both sharing users, but the cookies are not being shared. I’d appreciate any advice.
Thanks
December 10, 2008 at 11:50 am #69887In reply to: bbPress 0.9.0.3 (stable) released
wiseacre
MemberGood work, Sam!
Thank you !!!
December 10, 2008 at 11:06 am #69683In reply to: Integrating Brand New Forum and Blog
_ck_
ParticipantJust download and start playing with it. Best way to learn about anything.
Structure is extremely similar to WordPress with improvements because bbPress doesn’t have to support the old legacy problems that WordPress has.
My first tip to anyone installing bbpress is
1. don’t call the folder bbPress, maybe call it
forums
(plural)2. don’t install it directly under wordpress unless you really think that is more natural
suggested:
webroot
blog
forums
3. remember during integration you have to change your cookie path in wordpress and bbpress to the webroot, otherwise you’ll never get the cookies to integrate
Then follow the Integration 101 topic.
-
AuthorSearch Results