[r-a-y]

Did you know that JJJ is also a great acronym to describe this?

Jubilant
Joie de vivre
Jazzy

🙂

[John James Jacoby]

That’s annoying. Can you create a trac ticket over on bbpress.trac.wordpress.org, and I’ll check it out for 2.1.1?

[John James Jacoby]

If bbporg_ is in the twentyten theme, that’s me being an idiot; and I’ll have to fix it in 2.1.1. Can you create a trac ticket over at bbpress.trac.wordpress.org, and I’ll take a look into this more?

• This reply was modified 13 years, 10 months ago by John James Jacoby.

[viktora]

Not sure what you are meaning… I have custom WP template written from scratch. And I would like to add bbpress 2.1 template to it. I did what I described above just to see if any result outcomes. I expected to see header-body-footer forum screen (based on my knowledge of template packed in bbp-theme-compat directory). My custom WP template uses header – left sidebar – body – right sidebar – footer. So the difference should be visible (there should not be any sidebars). But I saw just the forum inside my custom theme (with left and right sidebars). In the target design, I would like to have the bbpress designed like here on bbpress.org (with left sidebar).

My custom WP template looks like this: http://poradci-sobe.cz/
My old bbpress forum (1.1) looks like this: http://poradci-sobe.cz/diskutujeme/ (I would like to have the new bbpress 2.1 designed in this way)
And here is how the new bbpress 2.1 forum looks like now: http://poradci-sobe.cz/forums/ (this is not wanted, the “1.1” design is desired but I am not able to theme the default bbpress template in bbp-template-compat root directory

[darkhorse20]

To make things even clearer:

Before 2.1, the feed was showing up fine.

After 2.1, instead of the feed showing up, now it says “The feed is either empty or unavailable.”, indicating the feed is empty. But it’s not empty because the feed is showing up when I view it in my browser.

[Anointed]

You can do this with jQuery

jQuery(document).ready(function($) {

$('a[href^="http://"]').filter(function(){
return this.hostname && this.hostname !== location.hostname;
})
.click( function() {
window.open(this.href);
return false;
});

});

Might be able to clean it up a bit and modify it for use with multisite, but it’s a start.

[darkhorse20]

Oops, the code got parsed funky. Basically, I’m using a variation of the code on this page: https://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/fetch_feed

[StudioManager]

Wanted to say Thank you for trying even though isn’t not all on the bbpress communities shoulders.

Also I have attempted to deactivate every plugin that touches bbpress and then deactivating bbpress and reactivating it clean, no change.

[darkhorse20]

On some of my pages, I’m using the fetch_feed function to take the bbPress RSS feed to display the list items. After installing 2.1, none of the feeds are working anymore. Here’s the code I’m using:


get_item_quantity(3);
$items = $feed->get_items(0, $limit);
}
if ($limit == 0) echo 'The feed is either empty or unavailable.';
else foreach ($items as $item) : ?>
<a href="get_permalink(); ?>" title="get_date('j F Y @ g:i a'); ?>">get_title(); ?>get_description(), 13, 140); ?> <a href="get_permalink(); ?>">>>

Any idea why it’s not working anymore?

[StudioManager]

Thanks for the tip, however there is no change. there is one thing that seems to be odd that shows up also only for non-admin users. If I change the bbpress forum to use the 2010 theme files it works perfect for the admins but users get this error:

Fatal error: Call to undefined function bbporg_reply_search_query() in /home/content/”removed for privacy”/wp-content/plugins/bbpress/bbp-themes/bbp-twentyten/bbpress/content-single-topic.php on line 42

I have re-downloaded bbpress 2.1 but this error remains. Not sure if it has anything to do with anything

[Gautam Gupta]

Looks great!

[The Lacesz]

What can I change to have all links that are posted on the site open in a new window instead of the window that the forum is using? Thanks!

[Anointed]

Looks fantastic. Great job JJJ

[John James Jacoby]

Thanks everyone for the kind words. 🙂

[John James Jacoby]

Does Membership-lite have any bbPress specific code in it? I suspect it has something to do with roles and capabilities. Maybe try deactivating bbPress, reactivating it, and visiting Settings > Forums. That silently does a bit of validation on some bbPress settings, in the event things get botched somehow.

[John James Jacoby]

That’s a bit odd, since that’s a core WordPress WP_Query method.

Can you confirm that your update went smoothly? Maybe try reinstalling bbPress manually.

Also, what theme are you using? It’s possible there’s a conflict, or something else weird is going on.

Thanks for helping.

[Cristescu Bogdan]

I get this ugly error:

Fatal error: Call to undefined method stdClass::have_posts() in /home/jorjette/public_html/wp-content/plugins/bbpress/bbp-includes/bbp-reply-template.php on line 168

I`m not able to see any single thread! Can someone help me with that? I am the only one who get the bbp-reply-template.php error?

[StudioManager]

So after hours of digging it appears that there is an incompatibility with 21 and Membership-lite 2.0.7 . Everything looks fine from the Membership admin login but all other users see for each topic is the replies (if any). unfortunately I doubt the membership plugin will receive an update anytime soon 🙁 any thoughts what might have changed from bbpress 2.0.2 that caused this so I can manually fix it?

[Mark McWilliams]

Sweet, very snazzy looking. Glad to see bbPress.org finally using the plugin!

[pimarts]

As for those CSS buttons, some of them could use a cursor:pointer, search button on the left for instance. Minor stuff, but still 😉

[Lynq]

Nice, I like it! Especially the CSS buttons. Currently updating one of my forums to 2.1 – looking good.

[solcjoye]

Hello,

New to bbPress and really am limited on html/css (but can usually find my way through things…)

I am trying to figure out how to change the title headings for the forums, so instead of it saying “Forum, Topic, Posts, etc.” I could change those labels to work more for my purposes of having the forum. I am using bbPress to create a file repository / community for teachers to upload curriculum/lessons plans etc. and then comment, discuss, critique, rate them etc.

Thanks for any help!

SJ

[markusbb]

Hi guys

Just to add to my latest reply above, I started a conversion with row limis = 100 and delay time = 1 and it was succesfull up to the lines 700-799. The conversion cannot pass that point. Whatever I do. It hangs always at 799.

Thank You

[markusbb]

Hi guys

I found the last query as @John James Jacob pointed out. However, I do not think that this is the issue. As I decrease the “Rows Limit” the conversion goes further one more step. I mean it will proceed one more conversion step and then hang. For instance, having “Row Limits” set to 10 it passed the “Converting topics (780 – 789)” but it hanged at “Converting topics (790 – 799)”. Before this, I set the “Row Limits” to 25, again the conversion executed one more conversion step than when the “Row Limits” set to 50.

I have no idea how to troubleshoot this. Any ideas?

Thank You

[Ryan Hellyer]

My two cents worth … bearing in mind that I don’t actually use bbPress at the moment so this is all theoretical, so treat my opinion accordingly …

I migrated a site with around 250,000 posts a while back, and the only thing I had trouble with was the import script timing out, but that’s an easily fixable bottleneck.

I think the main problem you might stumble across, is that WordPress isn’t that good at handling dynamic content IMO and so the server load may become a problem with lots of activity on your forum. Most sites are static, therefore you can cache the heck out of them, forums not so much.

Personally, I’d still use bbPress even for a fairly large forum though. I know WordPress better than anything else, and so I’d be more comfortable scaling bbPress to high traffic volumes than I would any other platform. My suspicion is that many other dedicated forum packages could theoretically handle a lot more load though, since they’re (theoretically) architected to handle dynamic content better than WordPress.

PS: Kudos to whoever’s been working on this site in the past 12 months. I haven’t been here in a while and it sure does look a lot better 🙂

• This reply was modified 13 years, 10 months ago by Ryan Hellyer.
• This reply was modified 13 years, 10 months ago by Ryan Hellyer.