Search Results for 'updated'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
February 23, 2011 at 1:46 pm #99192
In reply to: WPMimic V.1
Vietson
Member@Adrienkb – Are you sure that it doesn’t work? I’ve tested many times and it works great. If you were testing out the registration on my beta site, then i purposely disabled the registration page and its always an update or two behind the actual updated version.
@llny – I don’t have the orginal css file to version 0.02 anymore so I can’t really look up to the css. Why don’t you try the new version 1.0 for now. A setting page is coming, I just gotta finish it up.
February 21, 2011 at 7:03 pm #94983In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
John James Jacoby
KeymasterThe bbp-twentyten theme is currently a child theme, but will most likely be a parent theme and include all of the updated twentyten’s theme files in addition to the bbPress ones. Granted, that’s going to crowd the theme up with a ton of files, but that’s kind of just what happens when you add a ton of functionality.
February 18, 2011 at 6:06 am #94969In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
John James Jacoby
KeymasterOriginal post updated with progress on various parts.
@luminis – bbPress should follow the language that your WordPress installation is, however there currently aren’t any language packs that I know of. To change the various things in your theme, you’ll want to create a new theme that you can modify safely. The easiest way to do that is to copy the bbp-twentyten folder out of /bbp-themes and into your /wp-content/themes/ folder, rename it, and edit the name of your new theme in style.css so that you don’t get the two confused. Your # 3 can be found in form-bbp_topic.php, and # 4 would require a helper plugin to hook into ‘bbp_is_user_subscribed’ and adjust the default value.
February 1, 2011 at 2:36 pm #99113In reply to: bots spamming in my forum w/ human test!
_ck_
ParticipantI updated it a couple of days ago but even I see a spammer about every other week.
I have to assume it’s humans doing the account creation because it’s so cheap to get labor now, it might be semi automated where it fills out the info and allows the human to deal with the question.
You’d think they’d figure out this is a waste of time but I guess they are looking for the sites where the postings stick around for awhile.
I can deal with it once a week until I figure out another way to tackle them.
By the way I don’t use akismet and I always recommend you disable the bozo feature which Sam made a plugin you can turn off at my request, because it just causes havoc with false positives.
January 29, 2011 at 2:13 pm #103636In reply to: Security Bug Report Contact
citizenkeith
ParticipantThanks for the reply, JJJ. I’m not a developer, so when I go to trac I’m easily overwhelmed by the number of tickets and not sure where to look for specifics.
Sometimes it’s frustrating for users like me to get information about bbPress developments. I’d expect news to be posted here on the forum. Then there’s bbpdevel.wordpress.com, but that hasn’t been updated since September. I’m sure there’s info in IRC logs too. It seems there are many places for information to be posted, and it’s not always the place I expect it.
Anyway, I really do appreciate the information, and I’m looking forward to 1.1 (and also an update to the 0.9 branch).
January 29, 2011 at 2:13 pm #98536In reply to: Security Bug Report Contact
citizenkeith
ParticipantThanks for the reply, JJJ. I’m not a developer, so when I go to trac I’m easily overwhelmed by the number of tickets and not sure where to look for specifics.
Sometimes it’s frustrating for users like me to get information about bbPress developments. I’d expect news to be posted here on the forum. Then there’s bbpdevel.wordpress.com, but that hasn’t been updated since September. I’m sure there’s info in IRC logs too. It seems there are many places for information to be posted, and it’s not always the place I expect it.
Anyway, I really do appreciate the information, and I’m looking forward to 1.1 (and also an update to the 0.9 branch).
January 23, 2011 at 2:43 pm #104119In reply to: "New" wordpress forum plugin: Mingle Forum
gswaim
ParticipantI share many of your concerns. I too have stumbled onto the Mingle Forum plug-in.
I have it installed along with the Mingle plug-in. This turns a WordPress site into a BuddyPress-like site with an extremely short learning curve. I had both installed, tweaked on the code to remove a couple of links that I didn’t want, modified the CSS to make a near perfect style match to my theme, and understood how to configure administrate the forum in about 3 hours.
I am not a code monkey and cannot compare the pros and cons of how Mingle Forums stacks up against the bbPress plug-in or any other solutions. The security vulnerability has also been resoled to my satisfaction.
Before I implement a solution I am more concerned with its support and sustainability. Both plug-ins have have over 50,000 downloads and the Mingle Forum plug-in was last updated 20 days ago. I had one problem/question with the installation and it was answered by the plug-in’s author within hours. Within the last 5 days the Mingle Forum’s author has posted 5 videos instructional videos on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/cartpauj). All indications are that this project is alive and well.
I am going to go live with it this week and plan to use it until another plug-in solution, which is better, becomes available.
January 23, 2011 at 2:43 pm #99019In reply to: "New" wordpress forum plugin: Mingle Forum
gswaim
ParticipantI share many of your concerns. I too have stumbled onto the Mingle Forum plug-in.
I have it installed along with the Mingle plug-in. This turns a WordPress site into a BuddyPress-like site with an extremely short learning curve. I had both installed, tweaked on the code to remove a couple of links that I didn’t want, modified the CSS to make a near perfect style match to my theme, and understood how to configure administrate the forum in about 3 hours.
I am not a code monkey and cannot compare the pros and cons of how Mingle Forums stacks up against the bbPress plug-in or any other solutions. The security vulnerability has also been resoled to my satisfaction.
Before I implement a solution I am more concerned with its support and sustainability. Both plug-ins have have over 50,000 downloads and the Mingle Forum plug-in was last updated 20 days ago. I had one problem/question with the installation and it was answered by the plug-in’s author within hours. Within the last 5 days the Mingle Forum’s author has posted 5 videos instructional videos on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/cartpauj). All indications are that this project is alive and well.
I am going to go live with it this week and plan to use it until another plug-in solution, which is better, becomes available.
January 18, 2011 at 10:13 am #94867In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Ryan Gannon
MemberAny idea when we’re going to see a release beat or otherwise? It’s cool that it’s get updated a lot but it makes doing anything awkward.
December 31, 2010 at 7:28 am #103620In reply to: Security Bug Report Contact
John James Jacoby
KeymasterI’m in a tough spot with regards to internet access until I’m home from holiday on Jan 3; home or not, getting updated versions of 0.9.x and 1.0.x out asap is my top priority.
December 31, 2010 at 7:28 am #98520In reply to: Security Bug Report Contact
John James Jacoby
KeymasterI’m in a tough spot with regards to internet access until I’m home from holiday on Jan 3; home or not, getting updated versions of 0.9.x and 1.0.x out asap is my top priority.
December 27, 2010 at 8:31 pm #103608In reply to: Security Bug Report Contact
_ck_
ParticipantMaybe I am getting rusty, but looking at the diff, I don’t see it.
Basically it’s the same thing, shuffled around a bit and the same
esc_urlandesc_attris being used at the end, which is the same pattern as the existing 1.0/1.1 code.Are you sure the fix was not being caused by just having a more updated version of
esc_urlandesc_attr?Or was it just being solved by moving those two sanitizers up higher before
bb_safe_redirectcould ever be called. Because that was definitely an oversight on someone’s part (not me). Based on the comments I’d guess they thought their functionality was for display filtering and not actually sanitization.Looking at
esc_urlthough, its default is indeed meant for displaying urls by default, note the comment in the code “Replace ampersands and single quotes only when displaying.” and how the context is set by default to “display”.Maybe test your solution with a url that contains an ampersand, it probably will not work?
Also, are you relying on the list of protocols to do the sanitization? Because that could be defeated too (and would prevent using relative urls that are legitimate).
ps. very minor but you have confusing indentation indicating nesting with the code at line 18 – which actually is not nested
Feel free to email me directly if that’s better.
December 27, 2010 at 8:31 pm #98508In reply to: Security Bug Report Contact
_ck_
ParticipantMaybe I am getting rusty, but looking at the diff, I don’t see it.
Basically it’s the same thing, shuffled around a bit and the same
esc_urlandesc_attris being used at the end, which is the same pattern as the existing 1.0/1.1 code.Are you sure the fix was not being caused by just having a more updated version of
esc_urlandesc_attr?Or was it just being solved by moving those two sanitizers up higher before
bb_safe_redirectcould ever be called. Because that was definitely an oversight on someone’s part (not me). Based on the comments I’d guess they thought their functionality was for display filtering and not actually sanitization.Looking at
esc_urlthough, its default is indeed meant for displaying urls by default, note the comment in the code “Replace ampersands and single quotes only when displaying.” and how the context is set by default to “display”.Maybe test your solution with a url that contains an ampersand, it probably will not work?
Also, are you relying on the list of protocols to do the sanitization? Because that could be defeated too (and would prevent using relative urls that are legitimate).
ps. very minor but you have confusing indentation indicating nesting with the code at line 18 – which actually is not nested
Feel free to email me directly if that’s better.
December 17, 2010 at 7:03 am #68720amxcld9
MemberI have the same issue, I think it happened immediately after I updated the
define( ‘BB_AUTH_KEY’, xxxx
define( ‘BB_SECURE_AUTH_KEY’ xxxx
define( ‘BB_LOGGED_IN_KEY’, xxxx
define( ‘BB_NONCE_KEY’, xxxx
keys in the BB_config file – I also changed the $bb_table_prefix =
As instructed to same as WP config file, I changed this back to BB_ but that didn’t help…
Any ideas?
I am using
WP 3.0.3 and BB 1.02 (I think, I can’t see admin screen to check!)
December 14, 2010 at 8:21 pm #94753In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
MemberHow many version have you installed/updated?
it might be that you need to clear the database of bbPress data if you installed an earlier revision.
December 6, 2010 at 3:49 pm #94719In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
bhale
MemberI actually had a slightly different experience. My permalink structure was set to custom, which was certainly not intentional. I changed it to %month%/%name% and this finally updated the link. (No effect on switching themes.)
I guess it is just a little tricky to reliably force a flush in the links.
I agree with your suggestion in the ticket that /forum/user/admin would be preferable.
December 6, 2010 at 3:38 pm #94718In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
MemberReset theme to twentyten, then reactivate the bbPress theme. then reset your permalinks – that should set it up – as in it did for me in 3.1 and 3.0.2
I’ve updated that ticket.
December 4, 2010 at 9:53 pm #94706In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
Memberhttp://wordpress.elfden.co.uk/forum/ updated – everything cleaned out for everyone to start playing again.
November 30, 2010 at 10:36 pm #36329Topic: User roles all set to 'inactive – no role'
in forum Troubleshootingtimgedny
MemberI’ve just updated my WordPress blog from version 2.0 to 3.0.1 and subsequently upgraded BBPress from version 0.8.3 to the latest release (1.0.2?). However, now all the users of the forum are displaying as inactive on the front end despite the fact that they have a ‘member’ role when viewed through the admin panel.
I suspect this is related to the fact that the users are shared between WordPress and BBPress – in WordPress they have no role.
The problem is that there are 45000 subscribers so to change these manually will take quite some time. I think I’m also right in saying that users in WordPress with no role don’t have any meta values so I’m not sure this can be addressed by finding and replacing anything in the database.
Does anyone have any ideas? I really don’t want to have to assign these users roles by going through 30 at a time in the WordPress admin screens!
Thanks in advance for your help.
November 30, 2010 at 6:59 pm #102968In reply to: bbpress Forum Signature
anthonyluth
MemberWeird, thanks 3sixty. I had recently readded the plugin and forgot to reset that. It works fine now. Originally i had set 900 as the character limit but i updated the plugin and it was restored to the default 300.
November 30, 2010 at 6:59 pm #97868In reply to: bbpress Forum Signature
anthonyluth
MemberWeird, thanks 3sixty. I had recently readded the plugin and forgot to reset that. It works fine now. Originally i had set 900 as the character limit but i updated the plugin and it was restored to the default 300.
November 29, 2010 at 5:55 pm #36309Topic: BBPress is ok or dead ?
in forum Requests & FeedbackFredo5880
MemberHi !
I’m french and i saw that the french website isn’t updated since 1 year.
Is the project already alive (even in english) because i’m looking for a forum for WordPress !
Regards,
Fred
November 28, 2010 at 11:13 am #94680In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
Memberupdated the demo, you’ll see a few widgets in the sidebar (ticket already open…)
November 16, 2010 at 9:40 pm #94605In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
MemberThat ticket has been fixed, demo updated.
November 16, 2010 at 12:38 pm #102712In reply to: Broken HTML in updated bbPress
mr_pelle
ParticipantI’m on bbPress latest trunk, testing bbPM 1.0.1 and I’ve never had any problem at all.
-
AuthorSearch Results