Search Results for 'bbpress'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
December 7, 2010 at 1:53 am #102795
In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
John James Jacoby
KeymasterbbPress isn’t more or less SEO friendly than any other forum software. Considering it uses almost the exact same permalink rewriting code as WordPress. The bbPress plugin for WordPress will offer custom permalink options and I’ll look into allowing for this.
December 7, 2010 at 1:53 am #97695In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
John James Jacoby
KeymasterbbPress isn’t more or less SEO friendly than any other forum software. Considering it uses almost the exact same permalink rewriting code as WordPress. The bbPress plugin for WordPress will offer custom permalink options and I’ll look into allowing for this.
December 7, 2010 at 12:11 am #102792In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
Richmouse
MemberYou can control the meta tags of any website or blog from the admin panel or the with most websites the c panel.
Therefore if your claiming that this blog software is not search engine friendly the real reason is simple.
Your meta tags are not done right.
Wish to have that problem fixed then visit http://pptrevshare.com
The owner has access to the Richmouse tools that where used to take Richmouse Promotions and PPTRevshare to top of google search engines.
We can correct this problem for and every user of this type of blog.
It’s not that this blog is not search engine friendly it’s you don’t have it set up right.
December 7, 2010 at 12:11 am #97692In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
Richmouse
MemberYou can control the meta tags of any website or blog from the admin panel or the with most websites the c panel.
Therefore if your claiming that this blog software is not search engine friendly the real reason is simple.
Your meta tags are not done right.
Wish to have that problem fixed then visit http://pptrevshare.com
The owner has access to the Richmouse tools that where used to take Richmouse Promotions and PPTRevshare to top of google search engines.
We can correct this problem for and every user of this type of blog.
It’s not that this blog is not search engine friendly it’s you don’t have it set up right.
December 7, 2010 at 12:05 am #94722In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
John James Jacoby
KeymasterMade some changes to sub-forum functionality and display. Using the WP_Query class it’s possible to retrieve and manipulate almost any combination of forums and subforms, so what’s currently in bbPress plugin core is going to be an iterative process that I hope some of you are able to contribute to.
December 6, 2010 at 10:13 pm #102791In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
guly
Participant1. Props to mr_pelle for the nicer permalinks plugin – this is one of my favorites.
2. Is there a “sitemaps for dummies” tutorial out there for someone who’s never generated a dynamic sitemap before?
December 6, 2010 at 10:13 pm #97691In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
guly
Participant1. Props to mr_pelle for the nicer permalinks plugin – this is one of my favorites.
2. Is there a “sitemaps for dummies” tutorial out there for someone who’s never generated a dynamic sitemap before?
December 6, 2010 at 9:50 pm #94721In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
John James Jacoby
KeymasterHaven’t explored the idea of include year/month/day in the topic slug, but it should be possible to do.
Right now you’ll end up with something like:
example.com/forums/forum/forum-title/
example.com/forums/topic/topic-title/
…and even…
example.com/forums/reply/reply-title/
…if you want to create a single template to show off one individual reply.
December 6, 2010 at 7:57 pm #103096In reply to: convert from simple forum to bbpress
kits
Participantany body now about this?!
December 6, 2010 at 7:57 pm #97996In reply to: convert from simple forum to bbpress
kits
Participantany body now about this?!
December 6, 2010 at 7:37 pm #94720In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
scorpio0679
MemberFor bbPress forum topics will it be possible to store in separate directory than blog posts? In this way:
example.com/archives/2010/12/06/blog-entry-title
example.com/forums/forumname/2010/12/06/forum-topic-title
Thanks for everything you guys are doing—I also asked a question in the most recent blog entry comments as I hadn’t found this thread yet.
December 6, 2010 at 3:49 pm #94719In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
bhale
MemberI actually had a slightly different experience. My permalink structure was set to custom, which was certainly not intentional. I changed it to %month%/%name% and this finally updated the link. (No effect on switching themes.)
I guess it is just a little tricky to reliably force a flush in the links.
I agree with your suggestion in the ticket that /forum/user/admin would be preferable.
December 6, 2010 at 3:38 pm #94718In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
MemberReset theme to twentyten, then reactivate the bbPress theme. then reset your permalinks – that should set it up – as in it did for me in 3.1 and 3.0.2
I’ve updated that ticket.
December 6, 2010 at 3:32 pm #94717In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
Memberahh that’s a thought, I’m running 3.1 as well… I’ll test in 3.0.2
December 6, 2010 at 3:29 pm #94716In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
bhale
MemberNope, latest trunk in a test WP 3.1 install on my webserver.
/user/admin works directly in the bbp-twentyten theme, but the links on topics are still off of /blog/{/user/admin} for me.
December 6, 2010 at 3:23 pm #94715In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Rich Pedley
MemberIs this locally? I have the same issue, but on my webhosts it works fine
eg. http://wordpress.elfden.co.uk/user/admin/
oh and relevant trac ticket: https://trac.bbpress.org/ticket/1391
December 6, 2010 at 3:12 pm #103133campbellduke
MemberHi Mobimean – I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. The best plugin in the world is of little use if people can’t get it to function. We’re in a position today where there are more people like us – not quite lay-people, but not programmers.
I’d hazard to guess that documentation is the next phase for bbpress. I hope so, because it does a lot of things I’d like to have on my site.
b.
December 6, 2010 at 3:12 pm #98033campbellduke
MemberHi Mobimean – I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. The best plugin in the world is of little use if people can’t get it to function. We’re in a position today where there are more people like us – not quite lay-people, but not programmers.
I’d hazard to guess that documentation is the next phase for bbpress. I hope so, because it does a lot of things I’d like to have on my site.
b.
December 6, 2010 at 2:52 pm #94714In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
bhale
MemberNot working out for me just yet – deactivated/activated, Saved the on Permalinks panel, and started a new topic. The link in my gravatar or user name goes to /blog/user/$username/, which is picked up by the 404 handler.
Am I supposed to be linked to a different url structure?
December 6, 2010 at 1:34 pm #102790In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
scorpio0679
MemberPerfect. Thank you, Mr. Pelle. I’d read on certain review sites that the major drawback to bbPress was that it is afraid of spiders. This plugin basically turns it into a standard blog format, correct? And allows spiders to crawl the site as easy as a regular WP blog?
December 6, 2010 at 1:34 pm #97690In reply to: BBpress is not a search engine friendly forum
scorpio0679
MemberPerfect. Thank you, Mr. Pelle. I’d read on certain review sites that the major drawback to bbPress was that it is afraid of spiders. This plugin basically turns it into a standard blog format, correct? And allows spiders to crawl the site as easy as a regular WP blog?
December 6, 2010 at 10:54 am #94713In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Willabee
Member“First pass at user profiles and front-end user profile editing is now in the plugin branch. Props GautamGupta for the original patch as part of one of his Google Code-in tasks.”
So.. will this extra function be easily shut off or are we gonna have to rip it out? Or is it gonna detect wether BuddyPress is activated?
December 6, 2010 at 9:55 am #94712In reply to: bbPress 2.0 – Updates
Erlend
ParticipantThat’s excellent news about W3 Total Cache, I’m very glad to hear you’re paying attention to the big cache plugins. WP+BP+BB is no joke laughing matter
December 6, 2010 at 8:33 am #103113In reply to: Translate a BBPress Theme
Francesco Bigiarini
ParticipantCan you tell me how can i edit a .mo file in a Mac? how can i decompile the .mo file?
You can translate a template file only if the original author have included support for internationalization. If you find a .po file in the theme’s folder you can use it. If there isn’t such a file then you are forced to manually change the template files.
Can you tell me how can i edit a .mo file in a Mac? how can i decompile the .mo file?
You must not touch them. The .mo (Machine Object) files are the “compiled” form of .po (Portable Object) files so you must not edit them but instead you must retrieve the source .po, translate it and create a .mo. On my UNIX-like machines (Mac and Debian) I use http://www.poedit.net/ which is a decent gettext editor.
Keep in mind that sometimes you will find a .pot (Portable Object Template) file instead of a .po. A .pot is a blank translation table in which no strings are translated but usually a translator take the english file and use it.
December 6, 2010 at 8:33 am #98013In reply to: Translate a BBPress Theme
Francesco Bigiarini
ParticipantCan you tell me how can i edit a .mo file in a Mac? how can i decompile the .mo file?
You can translate a template file only if the original author have included support for internationalization. If you find a .po file in the theme’s folder you can use it. If there isn’t such a file then you are forced to manually change the template files.
Can you tell me how can i edit a .mo file in a Mac? how can i decompile the .mo file?
You must not touch them. The .mo (Machine Object) files are the “compiled” form of .po (Portable Object) files so you must not edit them but instead you must retrieve the source .po, translate it and create a .mo. On my UNIX-like machines (Mac and Debian) I use http://www.poedit.net/ which is a decent gettext editor.
Keep in mind that sometimes you will find a .pot (Portable Object Template) file instead of a .po. A .pot is a blank translation table in which no strings are translated but usually a translator take the english file and use it.
-
AuthorSearch Results