Working on the BuddyPress Groups. Opponent right now. Probably a beta soon, to test some things I’m trying out.
Permissions issue on one of your plugins folders. Google what the perms should be and how to repair them. Should be relatively straight forward.
I felt the same way at first when I found WordPress, but check out how the functions work and what you can pass into them. Most of them accept a before and after attribute so you can customize the output.
I’m working on something for bbPress core in 2.1. Right now there’s no easy way to get a post count without querying the posts table directly every time. It’ll store counts in user meta and keep things in sync.
If you absolutely must have a page there, you’ll want to use Shortcodes or a custom page template of your coding to customize it.
Awful spammy to bump a 5 year old topic. Closing.
You’ll probably need to hook a custom function ithat you create nto one of the actions in the template files, depending on where you want the code to appear.
Don’t use the Shortcodes, just use the widget already supplied by bbPress.
It looks like the CSS just isn’t being included at all. Does your theme use wp_head();
Probably easiest to stick with what you have, at least for your users. Eventually the bbPress 2 templates and styling will take over forums entirely, and you’ll have the option to migrate your existing forums over, which will be strongly recommended.
bbPress 2.1 will come with support for the WordPress visual editor.
BuddyPress uses the activity stream component to accomplish this. You could use it, and bbPress will work with it.
Probably something our of wack filter wise. Possible autop is missing or unhooked.
Will need way more specific information to be of any help. Links to sites, versions of WordPress/bbPress, etc…
I don’t know what ‘gform_full_access’ is, but it sounds like another plugin is interfering with bbPress’s role and capabilities. That, or it’s a bug. Will need you to figure out which it is and report back if it’s something we can fix on our end.
@patking76 – is this with the 2.1 re-release?
@MTPower – Age old WordPress and bbPress UX issue. Could use some ajax to make it easier. bbPress 2.0 solves this, and when we update bbpress.org it will no longer be an issue. (You could have also used the link in the upper left, but it’s easily missed.)
@MTPower – Age old WordPress and bbPress UX issue. Could use some ajax to make it easier. bbPress 2.0 solves this, and when we update bbpress.org it will no longer be an issue. (You could have also used the link in the upper left, but it’s easily missed.)
This will happen automatically in the next release of both. If your code above literally returns “nothing” then it isn’t even being executed, since you should at least see feedback about there being no topics. If you do at least see that feedback, then the problem lies in bbp_get_user_topics_started(). Check out how it works and see if there is anything broken.
Worst case scenario, you can call your own WP_Query loop and display them yourself.
@acoburn4 – Sadly you won’t be able to. Because all of WordPress is being rewritten to /blog, it would take some server level rewriting to make your forums work below it. Even then, I am not sure it would really work. You’ll want to make your entire site run at website.com, create two pages: /blog and /forums, then setup each the way you want them to be.
@acoburn4 – Sadly you won’t be able to. Because all of WordPress is being rewritten to /blog, it would take some server level rewriting to make your forums work below it. Even then, I am not sure it would really work. You’ll want to make your entire site run at website.com, create two pages: /blog and /forums, then setup each the way you want them to be.
It’s custom built for the site. Based off the original Kakumei theme (for bbPress 1.1)
Assuming it’s a static page cache that isn’t being invalidated? Seems odd the post and meta update wouldn’t flush the object and query cache automatically.
It would be possible to do, yes. It is not a planned feature at this time, no.
Sounds like a bug with the redirect. Will need to take time to duplicate.
