Forum Replies Created
-
In reply to: bbPress 1.0 released
Is there any easy way to search for plugins that are compatible with the bbPress 1 branch?
In reply to: bbPress 1.0 alpha looks interestingIs there any estimate on when this will be coming out?
Very much looking forward to it
In reply to: A bit of advice neededAgain, thanks for the advice. Looking forward to playing with the new version
In reply to: A bit of advice neededAh brilliant,
Thanks so much for the clarification. I was getting the feeling that quite a few things had changed all right. The main development site has had quite a lot of work done so far, but on bbpress all I had really done was set it to use the header and footer from the WP theme.
It’ll be easy to dump it and start again.
Actually on that point. In installing the old version I stored the bb_press database tables in this site’s WordPress database, eg:
| bb_forums |
| bb_posts |
| bb_tagged |
| bb_tags |
| bb_topicmeta |
| bb_topics |
| wp_comments |
| wp_ig_caticons |
| wp_links |
| wp_options |
| wp_postmeta |
| wp_posts |
| wp_term_relationships |
| wp_term_taxonomy |
| wp_terms |
| wp_usermeta |
| wp_users |Should I delete each of the tables prefixed “bb_” before continuing?
Cheers,
Alex
In reply to: ValidationHmm. Transitional might seem like a good idea, but the whole point of strict is to ensure proper coding.
Roger Johansson has written an excellent article many moons ago addressing this desire to use XHTML transitional
http://24ways.org/2005/transitional-vs-strict-markup
I’ve read a lot of debate about how if you’re going to use XHTML transitional, you should really consider at least going back to HTML Strict. It’s something to do with forcing browsers into proper standards compliant mode.