Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Trac linking in the support forum

  • @sambauers

    Participant

    I’ve just added the ability to directly link to Trac tickets and changesets within your posts, for example…

    Just typing #964 links to ticket 964 in Trac that follows the progress of the XML-RPC interface.

    Typing [1832] links to changeset 1832 in Trac.

    You can also link to BackPress tickets ( #BP7 and [BP170] ) and WordPress tickets ( #WP2012 and [WP10043] )

    This is done using a new plugin http://bbpress.org/plugins/topic/trac-links-for-bbpress/

Viewing 22 replies - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • @ipstenu

    Moderator

    Tracklinking has had the bizarre effect of breaking apostrophes when in code blocks.

    ‘ is just fine.

    ' is not so much.

    @kevinjohngallagher

    Member

    Hey we can put the bug in trac and link to it now though ;-)

    @sambauers

    Participant

    The bug is easy fixed, thanks for flagging it.

    @lyrics

    Member

    The ability to directly link to Track tickets and change sets within our posts is version specific?

    @sambauers

    Participant

    Disabled it until it’s fixed.

    @sambauers

    Participant

    Fixed, back on

    @_ck_

    Participant

    testing:

    bbPress is the #1 forum software for do-it-yourselfers

    ;-)

    + should maybe be {3,8} instead

    backticks:

    bbPress is the #1 forum software for do-it-yourselfers

    nope, still broken in backticks.

    testing some more:

    Joe User

    100 Main Street Suite #17

    Anywhere, USA

    nope ;-) In fact it removed the space between Suite and #17

    [trac=123]see this ticket[/trac] or [trac]123[/trac] would be better.

    Or just copy the entire url out of trac once you’ve looked up the number anyway.

    @sambauers

    Participant

    How about ##101 ?

    @sambauers

    Participant

    OK, fixed _ck_’s problems. Anyone else?

    @ipstenu

    Moderator

    This is code with an apostrophe ' in the middle.

    That would be a double plus good.

    @_ck_

    Participant

    There’s is still a problem with htmlentities, you either call your filter too soon or too late after bbPress does it’s autop, etc.

    demo of bug:

    WordPress & bbPress

    (the and symbol is converted into an htmlentitiy, then your plugin sees the # and makes it a link) Broken all over bbpress.org

    You could make sure the pattern doesn’t end with a semicolon or maybe set priority 9.

    @sambauers

    Participant

    Heh, definately a border case!

    I don’t know too many people who hand encode their own HTML entities in the normal flow of text.

    @sambauers

    Participant

    Nicely spotted though!

    @_ck_

    Participant

    Um, no you missed my point. I didn’t enter an htmlentity,

    I simply entered the ampersand symbol. bbPress converts it to an htmlentity

    and then your plugin converts it to a trac code.

    only way now to get a real & is to enter & or put it in backticks &

    & & & &# & & &38;

    @_ck_

    Participant

    Sam this is still broken. See the previous post. there are &38;‘s all over the site.

    @chrishajer

    Participant

    I tried to post 1&1 and it comes up 1&1.

    edit Dec 20, 2008:

    this is fixed so the comment above looks like there was never anything wrong :-)

    @sambauers

    Participant

    Oh, that’s different. Will look.

    @sambauers

    Participant

    Just found out that entities behave really strangely in bbPress. For some reason the standard behaviour is to take unencoded entities and encode them when editing a post.

    @_ck_

    Participant

    There are numerous other quirks too in bbPress’s parsing.

    For example paragraph tags are stripped inside of backticks.

    @sambauers

    Participant

    OK, entities problem is (re)fixed for Trac linking.

    @chrishajer

    Participant
    <div>
    <h3>Backtick test</h3>
    <p>This is in a P block</p>
    This is not
    <?php echo bloginfo(); ?>
    </div>

    @chrishajer

    Participant

    @_ck_ <p> tags were not stripped in the backticks above.

Viewing 22 replies - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar