i resolved this. I realised the bb_capabilities listed was for a user as listed by their userid which I overlooked. I looked up wp_user for the userid of the new administrator and everything is working again.
nevermind. seems the objects are overly generic. i’ll have some patch it up to work.
I think you may be confused _ck_. memcache has it’s uses like php op_code. It does not take alot for it to have a benefit and the same applies to memcache. However I am not asking for a suggestion on avoiding memcache. I would like to see a better handling of objects in the same way you create a prefix for a database. If you set a large pool for memcache say 1gb. The idea of setting another instance and monitoring it with startup script gets a little bothersome especially when an array can be used to mitigate the possibility of one failed instance to drive your site down. In short I should say you don’t usually start another mysql to house a database nor would it be useful to do that with memcache.
Thanks samhaurs again. I just want to be sure there weren’t objects that are generically named that can be seen across bbpress installations like administrative or personal details that should be separate that some are improperly written to cache much like wordpress mu does at the moment.
you are a lifesaver sambauers. I am using object cache but it’s not deeply integrated . The only other question is do you happen to know if you have to set a key (if you can set a key) to prevent object sharing. I know this is a problem with wordpress mu. I wish this was documented somewhere.
I think there is some mistake on what the intent of my post was about. My post is never meant that I wanted a feature to “cache” the forum. I wanted the bbpress integration to work with memcache for a seemless login but currently it’s done by the cookie path.. I think I once again got confused on who to contact to get that feature added since not everyone uses cookies but than I suppose it is a problem when you set session handling to memcache by master value.
for my requirements memcache is more reliable and less messy. Besides you do not supercache a forum. I do not think you understand.
