bbPress Support Forums » Topic: Performance http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance bbPress Support Forums » Topic: Performance en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:01:51 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1 _ck_ on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37999 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:02:58 +0000 _ck_ 37999@http://bbpress.org/forums/ I'm curious how much faster 0.9 would be on your host but it's not important.

What you do need to do is install bb-benchmark and find out where exactly the slow down is. A flat summary for the page is not helpful at all.

]]> frooyo on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37962 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:03:40 +0000 frooyo 37962@http://bbpress.org/forums/ cough cough, an output cache would be awesome, cough cough

]]> Martin R. on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37956 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:33:17 +0000 Martin R. 37956@http://bbpress.org/forums/ Testet 0.9, Rc3 and 1.0..
Asked my hoster about NFS, they said no..

But ok.. ill give it a try. Thank you very much!

]]> Sam Bauers on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37954 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:29:47 +0000 Sam Bauers 37954@http://bbpress.org/forums/

vs well over 100 files for bbPress 1.0

To be pedantic, I count 61 files without any plugins active on the front-page. Still not great for NFS.

]]> _ck_ on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37938 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:26:57 +0000 _ck_ 37938@http://bbpress.org/forums/ 500ms on a empty bbPress install hints at NFS
SMF would probably be fastest on your current server as it uses 13 files to generate the front-page vs well over 100 files for bbPress 1.0

]]> Sam Bauers on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37935 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:17:49 +0000 Sam Bauers 37935@http://bbpress.org/forums/ Also, you can't really tell how fast each forum is when they are all empty. You need to insert some data in there to get a real idea.

]]> Sam Bauers on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37933 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:15:40 +0000 Sam Bauers 37933@http://bbpress.org/forums/ Between your first post and your last I released version 1.0, so unless you upgraded you are using the previous release candidate (1.0-RC-3) or the previous stable version (0.9).

The version is stated in the visible footer of the admin area.

]]> Martin R. on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37926 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:04:23 +0000 Martin R. 37926@http://bbpress.org/forums/ The one i found under Downloads: "The latest stable version of bbPress is “Bechet” version 1.0:"

]]> johnhiler on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37925 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:58:26 +0000 johnhiler 37925@http://bbpress.org/forums/ What version of bbPress are you using?

]]> Martin R. on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37919 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:16:32 +0000 Martin R. 37919@http://bbpress.org/forums/ Footer tells me: 0.397 seconds - but thats relative. I will change host and server when I publish the board. I just know 4 other boards that are faster on my server right now. So its not exactly beeing about "slow" - Its about making it faster. Perhaps with Caching because my board will have 90% passive readers/guests who can wait a few minutes for updates and should not slow it down.

But thanks. Looks like there arent any tipps or a caching-plugin. To bad, bbPress would be really great.

Firefox/Firebug/Yslow/Pagespeed-Tests:

Punbb: 200ms
Vbulletin: 200ms
Minibb: 300ms
Seoboard: 400ms
BBpress: 500ms
Phpbb: 500ms
Vanilla: 600ms

+-50ms

]]> chrishajer on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37887 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:13:03 +0000 chrishajer 37887@http://bbpress.org/forums/ How about posting a URL?

]]> Sam Bauers on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37881 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:02:39 +0000 Sam Bauers 37881@http://bbpress.org/forums/ _ck_ could be right about NFS. Also, bbPress does a few extra MySQL queries which seem redundant, but speed things up when you actually have posts in there.

It's hard to tell what you mean by "slow" when there is no quantitative information to go by.

Let us know who your webhost is as well.

]]> _ck_ on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37880 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:56:43 +0000 _ck_ 37880@http://bbpress.org/forums/ Install the bb-benchmark plugin and look at what's slowing you down.
If your host uses NFS storage, bbPress will be slow but there are other possibilities like a plugin misbehaving (since you aren't using any, I suspect it's NFS)

]]> Ipstenu on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37879 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:44:24 +0000 Ipstenu 37879@http://bbpress.org/forums/ Can you share those results? I'm curious, since I found it to run faster than phpBB and IPB (though anything runs faster than IPB...)

]]> Martin R. on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37878 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:32:17 +0000 Martin R. 37878@http://bbpress.org/forums/ No posts, no plugins and no customizations. Just a clean install.

No idea about the server, I simply compared the loadtimes of several php-boards.

]]> Ipstenu on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37876 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:32:31 +0000 Ipstenu 37876@http://bbpress.org/forums/ What are your server specs and how big is your forum?

]]> Martin R. on "Performance" http://bbpress.org/forums/topic/performance#post-37870 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:21:13 +0000 Martin R. 37870@http://bbpress.org/forums/ bbPress is sooooo great - the board of my dreams, but without Caching-Plugin its nearly useless for me because its soooooooooooo slow. Are there any major tips to improve the performance? Or is someone just working on a Caching-Plugin?

]]>